I was then able to benefit for five years from the Lacanian discourse, between academic discourse and contemporary analytical research orient by Jacques-Alain Miller ordinary psychosis . Ordinary psychosis and autism were the major encounters of my journey within this university.
First of all, why autism and working with children?
I was immiately taken on as an internship. And here I am for a first 15-day discovery internship, call upon to follow a young autistic person who absolutely did not want to be met and who spent his time putting in his mouth everything that came within reach. But, in this institution, I encounter a practice of several people orient by Lacanian psychoanalysis, where the value of speech is recogniz and where everyone is invit to report on their practice. I will subsequently do several internships and replacements as an ucator there. They will teach me beyond the professional title to occupy a place, that of non-knowlge, to invent, and to submit to the position of the subject.
This first encounter ordinary psychosis with autism will
In structuralist thought, there is something reassuring, a mathematical logic, clear diagnostic categories. But in Rennes the DU (University Discourse) was not without the accurate clean numbers list from frist database DA (Discourse of the Analyst) and our professors slipp us here and there, at the heart of the learning, the elements of a doctrine and of an analytical research where I discover the teaching of J.-A. Miller, the Lacanian orientation, starting in what is look-alike in yandex direct particular from the oxymoron, “ordinary psychosis”. Subsequently, during presentations of patients, I had difficulty identifying ordinary psychoses. So I put this signifier to work in the clinic and it still accompanies me today. Autism and ordinary psychosis are for me the paradigms of the Lacanian subject, of the speaking being , and they continue to teach me and to make me a Lacanian.
When I see Paul, he is agitat
speaks very loudly. He explains to me that he refuses to enter this system that forces him to consult. “If I have to come here, it’s up to me to decide. I’ve met loads of doctors, social workers. Not one of them listens to me. The doctors want to give me treatments to make me stupid. But they’re not going to get me with their fine words. And betting email list the social workers, they only know how to wave their pencils under my nose and tell me what to do. I want to stick their pencils in their carotid arteries.” I listen to him, silent. He continues by explaining that his wife is lying, that he doesn’t hit her but punches the walls. She makes fun of him to push him to the limit, to incite him to violence.
At his workplace, the Other is also malicious. He has heard several times, behind him, the voice of a colleague commenting on his remarks, to make fun of him.